Home   |   ACE Blog   |   Contact

Archive for November, 2009

Dr. Howard Fuller

Friday, November 20th, 2009

School choice advocate Dr. Howard Fuller was in Denver this week at the request of the Piton Foundation and the Donnell-Kay Foundation.

Dr. Fuller has long been a friend of ACE and sat down to be interviewed for our latest video. By fighting for expanded parental choice for four decades, Dr. Fuller has developed a way of articulating the need for reform that people understand and can relate to:

“On Feb. 1, 1960, four students from North Carolina A & T sat down at a lunch counter and demanded to be served. Here in 2009 … we can have four students go sit down at a lunch counter where they are welcome but they can’t read the menu. My question is, how in the world did we get here? How could this be?”

Dr. Fuller was speaking to an audience of educators and parents at Manual High School, and EdNews Colorado covered the event.

More from Dr. Fuller:

“This question about educating our children isn’t just a moral issue, which it is. It isn’t just a social justice issue, which it is,” Fuller said. “It is really an issue that deals with, how do you sustain a democracy?

“One thing I’ve learned over all of these years is that many people support change as long as nothing changes,” Fuller said. “We go to these conferences and we discuss change and we make the mistake of thinking that the discussion constituted the change.

“I have seen so many great schools that are educating the very kids that people say cannot be educated,” Fuller said, then paraphrased Mortimer Adler’s Paideia Proposal. “So what I’ve concluded is … there are no unteachable children. What there are, are adults who have not yet figured out how to teach them.”

Competition, Competition, Competition!

Monday, November 9th, 2009

A new paper released by Marcus Winters of the Manhattan Institute looks at the effects of charter schools within the New York City School District.

The bottom line:

The analysis reveals that students benefit academically when their public school is exposed to competition from a charter.

  • In both math and reading, the lowest-performing students in public school benefit from competition from charter schools.
  • For every 1 percent of a public school’s students who leave for a charter, reading proficiency among those who remain increases by about 0.02 standard deviations, a small but not insignificant number, in view of the widely held suspicion that the impact on local public schools of students’ departures for charter schools would be negative.
  • Competition from charter schools has no effect on overall student achievement in math.

We see the benefits of competition in nearly every aspect of our daily lives. And yet we are the only developed nation with an  educational monopoly. Charters - and private schools - represent competition to the public bureaucracy.

This study makes last week’s DPS elections all the more depressing. It will be a travesty if the new Denver school board turns its back on the bold reforms undertaken by Michael Bennet and Tom Boasberg.

We need more studies like this one that show the benefits of competition in our education system.

Denver Takes Step Backwards

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

Yesterday, education reform in Denver suffered a significant setback.

In three competitive Denver School Board races voters elected two union-backed candidates - Andrea Merida and Nate Easley Jr. The only reform candidate to win was Mary Seawell, who won the at-large seat.

As the Denver Post reports today:

The seven-member DPS board, heralded nationally for pushing academic and administrative reforms, now is effectively split 4-3 along ideological lines, with the minority supporting reforms pushed by Superintendent Tom Boasberg and his predecessor, U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet.

It seems clear that the increasingly popular charter school movement will suffer most. During the campaign Merida and Easley expressed concern about the growth of charter schools, as well as the general pace of reform - as if hundreds of thousands of childrens futures aren’t at stake. The board is charged with approving charter applications, and could significantly impede the growth of the charter movement.

The Post continues:

Charter-school advocates had framed this election in stark terms: If union-backed candidates were elected, the district’s momentum toward improvement would suffer and that could ruin Colorado’s shot at a share of the U.S. Department of Education’s competitive $4.35 billion “Race to the Top” fund.

It is also important to note that many charter schools in Denver specifically serve low-income communities; impeding charter school growth reduces the options for low-income students.

So today ACE is more important than ever. We continue to provide the only alternative for hundreds of low-income parents who are tired of the status-quo and seek to provide a quality education for their children.